And? Surely you're not expecting me to disagree with my own words? :-)
We have given you a reason that explains her response very adequately (I'm not asking you to accept the explanation, but it wouldn't hurt you all that much to acknowledge that it does explain it.)
We're still waiting for an explanation for her response to the angel that is consonant with your belief that there is absolutely *no* way that the traditional Christian teaching on this matter (held universally for 16 centuries) could be true.