Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Forest Keeper
My point was in regard to my opinion of the propensity of Catholicism to take the literal, intended sense of scripture. :)

Sorry, I still don't get it. (re: HA! Listen to the pot ... )

If you believe that God selected His elect, and they cannot be changed, then from His POV, the decision on our part is automatic.

Yes, from HIS point of view, His decision will prevail BECAUSE HE foresees our response to His graces, graces that He gives to others, as well. Again, we don't have access to that information. Only when we stand in front of Jesus, and He judges that "OUR righteousness exceeds that of the Pharisees, will {we} enter the Kingdom of Heaven". While we can have a certain confidence regarding our present, and we can also look to the future - we our hopeful that we will continue and persevere in abiding in Christ.

Of course, we don't experience that, we believe that we used our free will, when in reality our destiny was settled long before we even existed.

Again, you place God in time! God doesn't operate by human calendar. His action is all one simultaneous work that encompasses all of time. Just as Christ is ETERNALLY Begotten, "we" (those who are elect) are ETERNALLY of the elect - because God foreseen our actions and He responded by reaching into time and gracing us, enabling us to continue coming to Him. To God, His initiative and our response is all part of one action.

To God, there is not a calendar that He checks off "Things to do today", and then proceeds to do them. All has been done. God is the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last. To HIM, it is complete. To us, it appears that God "operates" first, and then we respond. But to Him, it is all one event. Thus, our response is seen at the same moment as His election of "us".

Regards

3,514 posted on 03/13/2006 8:35:53 AM PST by jo kus (I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore CHOOSE life - Deut 30:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3466 | View Replies ]


To: jo kus
Sorry, I still don't get it. (re: HA! Listen to the pot ... )

Your original statement was:

By denying the literal, intended sense of Jesus' Words, you do injustice to the passage.

My opinion is that Catholicism infrequently takes the literal meaning of a verse, or the common sense meaning of a verse (or passage). You have consistently held that the intended sense of Jesus' words is something completely different from the words themselves. It is a secret code, only decipherable by the Catholic hierarchy. :) The Bible doesn't say what it says, it in fact says something completely different, all the way up to being in the opposite. My comment was in light of all this, that it is funny that you should accuse me of doing an injustice to the passage, when your meaning of so many passages is so unjust to the words of those passages, of course, in my opinion.

3,632 posted on 03/16/2006 7:01:11 AM PST by Forest Keeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3514 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson