I wouldn't conclude that any more than I would conclude the angelic host had flaws with the fall of Satan and 1/3 of the angels. God wasn't surprise by them leaving and He certainly wasn't surprise by Adam and Eve. God made them exactly as He intended and they fell just as He intended.
While there is no clear reference to the election of Adam and Eve, many commentators (and I believe many church fathers) have always held Adam and Eve to have been saved. They base this upon the following verses:
So God has authority to force us to love Him? The authority to change our minds and our hearts? That's love, right?
Of course it is. Dont you try to change the hearts and minds of your kids? You do this because you love them and know whats best for them, dont you? If they paint the neighbor's car or jump off a roof don't you have a stern talking to them. Why? Because you love them and you don't wish to see them hurt themselves. Youre just not always successful at changing their hearts and youre not always right about the reason you want to change their hearts. God, OTOH is ALWAYS 100% successful at changing hearts and lives.
What your real gripe is, is simply that God doesnt do this for everyone. This is incomprehensible to your Greek thought process. Instead you would rather rationalize that God offers everyone, everything and only a few accept His offer. Sorry. This isnt the God of scripture. He makes choices and does what He pleases. And everything is perfectly right, holy and just regardless of what we think.
Harley, 2 Peter 3 says:
"The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance."
More cosmic game playing, Harley, or does +Peter know something Calvinists don't? Maybe Peter was just a Greek and without the inspiration of God or the influence of clearly superior 16th century Western European understanding of God? Poor +Peter, if only he'd been born in Geneva he might not have fallen into such error!