I need to make it clear that I do not shirk from any theological discussion about errors of Calvin, if only because his teaching has influence over souls today.
I lose my interest when opinions of Calvin about the history of the Papacy are brought forth. The man was a sworn enemy of the papacy. His opinion about history of the papacy is about as valuable as Ted Bundy's opinion on the history of US jurispridence.
This thread has shown me how the errors of Calvin pale in comparison to the errors I have seen posted on this thread by those who are critical of him.
But feel free to criticize him all you want. I've been known to do that too.