Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: lrslattery
This is backpedalling nonsense. How does their explanation jibe with the clear "O" rating for Caddyshack? Was Rodney Dangerfield SO morally offensive that the USCCB had to slap it with an "O"?

I think what USCCB is saying that they wouldn't want those who can assess movies from a Catholic perspective, to miss this heartfelt and universal theme of two men abandoning their marriage vows and children for the joy of impaling each others backsides. The power of the blogosphere outed these flamers, now they're scrambling to feign orthodoxy, until the next opportunity.

133 posted on 12/16/2005 3:14:38 PM PST by Antioch (Benedikt Gott Geschickt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: Antioch
The power of the blogosphere outed these flamers, now they're scrambling to feign orthodoxy, until the next opportunity.

I think you've hit nail on the head...The problem is, after decades of "problematic" things like coming from the USCCB and its bloated bureaucracy, I don't believe they can even come close to feigning orthodoxy.

Someone needs to clean the Augean stables in Washington, so to speak - or if that task is too daunting (and it very well may be), perhaps the Holy Father might require some other "conference" be established - maybe one more concerned with imparting the Faith and the salvation of souls?

136 posted on 12/16/2005 5:54:00 PM PST by lrslattery (http://slatts.blogspot.com ...Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson