Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DaveMSmith

"I ask because that part of the Creation story is not to be taken literally"

Why do you think that is not to be taken literally?


18 posted on 11/19/2005 11:59:43 AM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: PetroniusMaximus
Why do you think that is not to be taken literally?

Because there is a whole lot more to the Creation story, Genesis 1-3, than the literal text.

Chapter 1 is the six states of man's regeneration and the rise of the Church of Adam. Chapter 2 describes the Church of Adam and the nature of Celestial people that comprised it. Chapter 3 describes further generations of that Church and it's eventual fall before the flood.

If you want to quibble that it's more important that a day is a day and ignore the meaning of the story, that's okay. That part of the Word (up to Genesis 11) was written in a quasi-historical style... like a myth.

25 posted on 11/19/2005 2:56:40 PM PST by DaveMSmith (Thought from the eye closes the understanding, but thought from the understanding opens the eye. DLW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson