Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
I don't understand traditionalists' obsession with the Tridentine Mass. Certainly the Novus Ordo Mass has been very poorly implemented by ill-doctrinated liturgists, but in its purest form the Mass is quite beautiful and perfectly legit.

Even the Tridentine Mass was a radical "change" from the celebration of the first Christians. If we follow their line of thought, the only acceptable form of worship would be in Greek or Aramaic and we should abandon the Latin rite entirely for the Maronite.
5 posted on 10/14/2005 7:10:54 AM PDT by mike182d ("Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mike182d
Something can be valid (e.g., "legit"), yet inferior at the same time.

Even the best examples of the Missa Normativa are still lacking something when compared to the "Mass of all Ages."

And I say this as someone who has only assisted at the Tradtional Latin Mass a handful of times. It's just too obvious to miss.

I think the best thing for the Church to do with the liberty is to go back to 1965 and start over with the reform, doing it incrementally and organically this time.

7 posted on 10/14/2005 7:21:43 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: mike182d
we should abandon the Latin rite entirely for the Maronite.

:-)

Not surprisingly, following a similar train of thought, many American Maronites prefer the soft homiletics and quick liturgy at the NO Mass over the more orthodox reminders of their sins and the 1 1/2 hour Divine Liturgy in the Maronite parishes. There is no pleasing everyone.

14 posted on 10/14/2005 7:42:10 AM PDT by NYer (“Socialism is the religion people get when they lose their religion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: mike182d
Even the Tridentine Mass was a radical "change" from the celebration of the first Christians.

If it had been imposed three years after the Ascension it would be, however it was merely the formalization of the liturgies that had evolved organically over time. The idea that primitive = pure is a modernist fallacy i.e. Rousseau's "noble savage".

The Tridentine liturgy was a mature form of worship and the Novus Ordo was a radical departure from it, imposed on Catholics over a very short period of time.

I'm sorry that you do not understand this.

42 posted on 10/14/2005 8:54:32 AM PDT by TradicalRC (Benedicamus Domino.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: mike182d
Where is this pure form of the Novus Ordo that you speak of, besides Rome???

Certainly the NO Mass with the 10+ Eucharistic ministers in shorts, sandals and T-Shirts...the priests who skip sections of the Mass like creeds and homilies...Churches with no kneelers etc. IT AIN'T PURE. I'm Fed up with it.

Now Tridentine, Marionite, any of it is Fine with me and I know their Masses are valid for each other. But I do belong to the Latin Rite, and I have to take care of my corner.

95 posted on 10/14/2005 1:09:36 PM PDT by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: mike182d

So you disagree with Pope Benedict? Pope Benedict wrote that the new Mass was the only significant change or break in the mass in the history of the Church and was very disturbing. But what does he know, right?


97 posted on 10/14/2005 1:28:31 PM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson