Well, it answers the last question, but not the other two, one of which is speculative.
I dunno, no biggie. It just sounded like a strange answer. Either way, it doesn't matter to me.
Regarding Canon I, it is identical in it's Latin form in both Missals. English translations? yea, sure, they suck. That is inarguable.
I would recommend for a real comparison listen to William Biesach and Charles Coulombe's 16 hour line by line comparison between the Old Missal and the New Missal. Latin against Latin and English Translation against ICEL translations.
They also cover the consecrations by comparing the Chaldean and Coptic and I think a third Eastern rite with the Traditional Latin against the Novus Ordo.