[SmartCitizen]

I read enough of it to get the gist of it. It's a weak attempt to justify theistic evolution. Gosh, how did the church fathers get by without theistic evolution. Man had to wait for an atheist like Darwin to come along and discover it. Does that makes sense to you?

[jb6]

I read enough of it to get the gist of it. It's a weak attempt to justify theistic evolution.

Then I'd say you probably didn't get much past the first two paragraphs, as one there is nothing weak about it and two it is Scriptural. Oh and by the way, not only did Darwin have a degree in theology, he wasn't an atheist, but that's a side point.

[jb6]

Gosh, how did the church fathers get by without theistic evolution. Man had to wait for an atheist like Darwin to come along and discover it. Does that makes sense to you?

I'm still trying to figure out how they got by without the Einstionian theory of Gravity....or the Laws of the Conservation of Mass and Energy.