"Schism for the sake of schism."
Yet post No. 24 directly below yours, from Cardinal Hoyos, specifically states otherwise. Rash judgment on your part? Or a simple misunderstanding that you would wish to correct?
I'm confused. Cardinal Hoyos says the opposite of you, and he met the bishops.
My reading of the Hoyos letter is that he says the Society started without the intention of schism but began to go off the rails on a crazy train, if you will excuse the Ozzy reference.