No blanketing at all. I think we're just observing that certain strains of traditionalism are quite contented in their antisemitism. To wit, those that trumpet the notorious forgeries called the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" despite the fact that everyone else has know they've been fake for about a century.
By the way, you should know that many of the folks at the Association of Hebrew Catholics and other similar organizations are the ones who have been most strident in criticizing this nonsense that Jews somehow don't need to convert.
Meant to bump you to #37. Sorry.
I have heard about this "Protocol". But Protocol or not- ARE YOU GOING TO DENY THERE ARE NOT ZIONISTS PRESENT-ESPECIALLY TODAY? HAVE YOU SEEN THE NEWS WITH THE ZIONISTS THRETENING TO KILL THE ISRAELI SOLDIERS IF THEY ARE REMOVED FROM THE WEST BANK? WAS IT NOT THE ZIONISTS WHO WERE THE ORIGINAL "TERRORISTS" AFTER WWII, KILLING AND BLOWING UP THE BRITISH WHO WERE TRYING TO LEAVE PALESTINE IN SOME SORT OF A SEMBLANCE OF A DEMOCRACY-BUT WERE KILLED AND MAIMED BY THE RADICAL JEWS IN THE 30'S AND 40'S?
You should really learn your history before tagging names and labels around, as is the usual liberal way of getting anyone who is "Conservative" to back down. The Democrats use the "Racist" label on Conservative Republicans-and lose every time, and now you have the Novus Ordo Catholics, who really cant debate the issue on merit as they have nothing of substance to fall back on, throwing the antisemitic label around.