Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mershon
What Keating wrote as he wrote it was incorrect.

* Nope. Keating writes for knowledgeable Christians who know that even were a layman to be elected Pope, he would be ordained a Bishop.

Why rely upon him as a source for anything?

* He knows what he is talking about.

Good bye, sir. I sense you are spoiling for a fight with me and I am far too happy a Christian to accomodate you.

17 posted on 08/08/2005 11:20:05 AM PDT by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: bornacatholic

How come any time you are proven to post erroneous information, you back out and say "you are 'spoiling for a fight.'"

Keating never said anything about getting consecrated a bishop after election. He said one must be a Priest or Bishop PRIOR to being elected. Otherwise, he could not be elected as Pope.

This is the plain meaning of his words. Can you read them? If so, how can you say he knows what he is talking about?

Oh yes, I forgot, the self-proclaimed "lay magisterium." Silly me...

Don't let facts or truth get in the way of your agenda.


19 posted on 08/08/2005 11:24:57 AM PDT by Mershon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson