Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Hermann the Cherusker

Here's what Mr. Keating said:

"By definition the pope is the bishop of Rome, not the priest or layman of Rome. No man can be pope unless he is a bishop, just as no man is married unless he has a wife. If our hypothetical man is not made a bishop, either before or just after his election, he cannot be a real pope. There is no such thing as a layman pope or a priest pope. The bishop of Rome must be a bishop."

My conclusion is you are functionally illiterate and unable to understand clearly worded English sentences. What Mr. Keating wrote has no relation whatsoever to what you claim he wrote.




Hermann:

Thank you--and several others--for trying to make it clear that what I wrote accurately stated the Church's understanding.


135 posted on 08/09/2005 8:20:58 PM PDT by Karl Keating
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Karl Keating

Thank you Mr. Keating, for your fine work on behalf of our Church. I'm one of your spiritual children, your book "Catholicism and Fundementalism" having convinced me immediately of the newfound Catholic faith a friend and a Priest had opened my eyes too. God bless!


151 posted on 08/10/2005 6:21:56 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson