Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: bornacatholic; gbcdoj

Finally, I read GBC's cite as saying that the Last Supper, in and of itself, was NOT a "Mass," insofar as the Sacrifice was NOT consummated at the Last Supper.

NONE of your citations stated that the Last Supper was the first Mass. None.

All of them did state that the LS was the institution of the Holy Eucharist--a point which I made, as well.

Repeat--it's tiresome--come up with a citation which states, categorically, that the Last Supper was the "first" Mass.

Put up or shut up.


298 posted on 07/29/2005 2:20:43 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]


To: ninenot
Since the Church was not in existence until Pentecost, the Last Supper could not have been a Mass.

*Ping Trent. They taught the Mass was institued at the Last Supper.

The Council Of Trent

Session XXII: Doctrine on the Sacrifice of the Mass

Chapter I: On the Institution of the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass

Put up or shut up.

* LOL PERFECT. Again, I couldn't have drafted a more revealing sentence. You realy do imagine yourself as the one with authority.

Your posts illustrate perfectly the problem with the tradiitonalist approach to Catholicism. Prideful, arrogant, self-righteous, and nasty.

Well, I have had a belly-full of the trad-tactics for today. I am off this thread.

306 posted on 07/29/2005 2:42:28 PM PDT by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson