The present Pope? The one who wrote and contributed to Vatican II and was one of Rahner and Kung's best buddies. I love the Modernist liberal statement that "Vatican II was just implemented wrong". Read any of the 16 documents and one paragraph sounds "Catholic" and the next right after is so liberal and against everything the church taught and you would think it would teach it is mind boggling.
The present "Pope", who refused to take the Papal Oath, and considers himself no more than a figurehead and a Bishop, as Vatican II made into fact, has no real power, throws something to keep the right wing (or whatever is left of it) in line like bringing back chant or whatever, and then goes and meets with Rabbis or does some more damage.
He is not a leader. Would you consider George Bush or any of our Presidents a leader if they refused to take the Oath of office? Until a Pope takes the Oath I dont consider them the Pope, just a Bishop or a Cardinal.
You obviously don't trust Christ's words to Peter appointing him the rock on which the Church is based. There is nothing in the Vatican II documents that contradicts the deposit of faith.