Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/24/2005 5:27:39 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Graybeard58
The original statement defined the group's purpose as "helping churches promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ." That statement was revised at the group's annual meeting to read "help churches fulfill their God-given mission."

i supppose it would be useless to point out that without the Gospel of Jesus Christ there would be no Christianity. And what "God-given" mission will they promote? Will it be the cause of homosexuality like the Episcopalians are now experiencing?

2 posted on 07/24/2005 6:11:05 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

WAR EAGLE.

(Auburn First Baptist is in Auburn, Alabama, as is Auburn University.)

We have 300 Baptist churches in a county with 17,000 people. We also have 30 Methodist Churches, 2 Presbyterian Churches, one Lutheran, one Catholic, one Unitarian, one Assembly of God, one Church of God, maybe two dozen non-denominational churches and somewhere there's a Jehovah's Witness group meeting.

So which church do you think is doing to most to meet the needs of the poor?


3 posted on 07/24/2005 6:22:26 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (It translates as "72 raisins of startling white clarity" NOT 72 fair skinned maidens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58
It is my understanding that the CBF is slowly going liberal.
7 posted on 07/25/2005 2:01:01 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58
A recurring source of contention has been Jesus himself. The famous creedal battles of the fourth century pitched those who believed in Jesus' absolute humanity over against those who asserted his absolute deity. The compromise, that Jesus was both fully human and fully God, allowed both sides to claim victory but also left the matter mostly unresolved.

Umm...that's not accurate. The councils did not settle on a compromise between two schools of thought. They clarified and more clearly delineated what was already accepted as orthodoxy in the church defending it against both those who argued Christ's humanity to the exclusion of His divinity and vice versa.

11 posted on 07/25/2005 6:00:06 AM PDT by Frumanchu (Saved by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone to the glory of God alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58
The famous creedal battles of the fourth century pitched those who believed in Jesus' absolute humanity over against those who asserted his absolute deity. The compromise, that Jesus was both fully human and fully God, allowed both sides to claim victory but also left the matter mostly unresolved.

Oy vey! Two heresies compromise and call it the truth? That doesn't sound right.

16 posted on 07/25/2005 10:25:10 AM PDT by siunevada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58
The famous creedal battles of the fourth century pitched those who believed in Jesus' absolute humanity over against those who asserted his absolute deity. The compromise, that Jesus was both fully human and fully God, allowed both sides to claim victory but also left the matter mostly unresolved.

This isn't shocking. But in light of it, this is:

James L. Evans is pastor of Auburn First Baptist Church.

He's a pastor. A pastor thinks orthodox Christology is merely a compromise. Has he ever read the Gospels? The Epistles? And he doesn't even get the heresies right: the Docetists and Ebionites were around in the late First Century; the Fourth Century guys were Arians, who were different.

24 posted on 07/25/2005 11:39:18 PM PDT by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson