1 posted on
07/08/2005 8:02:24 AM PDT by
sionnsar
To: ahadams2; anselmcantuar; Agrarian; coffeecup; Paridel; keilimon; Hermann the Cherusker; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
07/08/2005 8:02:45 AM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Kyoto: Split Atoms, not Wood)
To: sionnsar; newgeezer
It is a very huge error to filter out everything from the bible that Jesus didn't say and separate if from what He specifically did say. People who make this error show that they really don't know very much about the overall Word of God.
4 posted on
07/08/2005 8:44:38 AM PDT by
biblewonk
(If you don't get the bible, how can you be a Christian?)
To: sionnsar
On the evidence, the least probable scenario is that our Lord Jesus Christ would have legitimised homosexual conduct. And wouldn't you know that this would be exactly the sinful state today's left is going for.
5 posted on
07/08/2005 9:08:26 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: sionnsar
Prohibition on adultery, amply evident in the Bible, is sufficient to condemn homosexual behavior, because a homosexual act is ipso facto an adultery.
It takes an extrabiblical view on marriage as an arbitrary union of consenting adults to miss this simple truth.
10 posted on
07/08/2005 1:01:42 PM PDT by
annalex
To: little jeremiah
11 posted on
07/08/2005 1:05:10 PM PDT by
scripter
(Let temporal things serve your use, but the eternal be the object of your desire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson