[sionnsar]

Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

[BelegStrongbow]

Leave me put it this way, a delicate reference to an indelicate expression:

I am convinced that precisely the same response is manifestly in order to these two propositions:

1. We should abandon historic Tradition and the inerrant authority of Scripture
2. The Supreme Court ruled rightly in deciding that economic benefit is sufficient public interest to justify invoking eminent domain against private property owners.

And I'm utterly against the second proposition in terms just recently used in a Freep poll on the subject, where a simple 'No' failed to suffice.

In Christ,
Deacon Paul+

[Alkhin]

Thank you sionnsar - this is a problem I have been struggling with myself, per the issue of "what to call ourselves and how to define what we mean by Anglicanism." Am tired of RCCers reducing it all to King Henry VIII (thanks to RCC teaching I did not know there was a deeper history to it beyond that one event) and tired of Protestants assuming that Anglicans are just a bunch of heathen in Christian clothing.

As per the female ordination, I have been talking with a friend of mine about this. The points outlined in the article will be helpful in backing my points up.