Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Church cool to Graham crusade
The World Peace Herald ^ | 06/23/05 | Julia Duin

Posted on 06/23/2005 9:06:58 AM PDT by murphE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-243 next last
To: Little_shoe
I have a question for you, and anybody else who cares to reply. I've never, ever found a satisfactory answer in the theology of any Protestant denomination:

Two equally honest, well-meaning, faithful, intelligent people read the Bible. They ask the Holy Spirit to guide them. They pray and meditate. One reads and decides that the Lord's Supper is merely symbolic. The other reads and believes that the Eucharist means "this is, really and truly, my actual Body."

In the history of Christianity, this has happened at least once. (In my opinion, it happens all the time.)

So, whose interpretation is right? Who's guided by the Holy Spirit? They both prayed for help, didn't they? But one answer is the truth, the other is a lie, and the Holy Spirit inspires no lie. The Lord Himself went so far as to say that whomever does not eat His Body does not have eternal life. Understanding what He meant by "my body" is vitally important. How are we to know what is the truth? Are we to go wherever our individual experiences lead us?

There have been plenty of brainy, prayerful people who read the Bible and come up with a more or less Catholic interpretation of things. Why is their "Spirit-guided," personal interpretation wrong while yours is right? And how do you know?
61 posted on 06/23/2005 6:26:20 PM PDT by Lilllabettt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: murphE

I admire Mr. Graham's lifelong work but note that he has never ventured into the truly meaningful debates of the day: abortion, homosexuality, and the secularization of society. Indeed, Mr. Graham represents an era reminiscent of the pre-1980s, when Evangelical Christians kept their religious and moral beliefs to themselves. Mr. Graham's failure to engage in the culture wars has definitely clouded the opinion I had of him when I was a child (I'm a cradle Catholic, but my maternal grandpa was Southern Baptist and a fan of Mr. Graham's).


62 posted on 06/23/2005 6:51:04 PM PDT by hispanichoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lilllabettt
But one answer is the truth, the other is a lie,

You said it sister.

63 posted on 06/23/2005 6:55:11 PM PDT by murphE (These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jo kus
This is most true in the case of true invincible ignorance. But we cannot judge that others are in this state - Bl. Pius IX warns us that we cannot, but must hold "one Lord, one faith, one baptism" - "it is unlawful to proceed further in inquiry". I wonder if the eagerness to proclaim to non-Catholics that "you, too, can be saved without joining the Church of Christ!" is truly helpful to the cause of Christ and his Gospel. While I cannot endorse everything in these two articles, since they are no longer quite in conformity with the teaching of the Church (having been written in the mid 19th century), I have found this and this, written by the American Catholic author Orestes Brownson, helpful in examining this issue. Quite true is what he says:
Give them the smallest peg, or what appears so, not to you, but to them;- the smallest peg, on which to hang a hope of salvation without being in or actually reconciled to the church by the sacrament of penance,- and all the arguments you can address to them to prove the necessity of being in the church in order to be saved, will have no more effect on them than rain on a duck’s back. You may bring them in the church for aesthetic reasons, by the grandeur and pomp of your liturgy, your taste in church decoration, your solemn and soul-entrancing music, even for intellectual reasons, but never as the necessary means of saving their souls. St. Augustine wrote his “Confessions,” but not usually do those converts write the history of their conversion, who were led to the church by the need they felt of getting rid of their sins, and of supernatural grace to assist them to lead an upright spiritual life. ... There can be no more fatal mistake than to soften, liberalize, or latitudinize this terrible dogma, “Out of the church there is no salvation,” or to give a man an oppurtunity to persuade himself that he belongs to the soul of the church, though an alien from the body.

64 posted on 06/23/2005 6:55:23 PM PDT by gbcdoj (For the justice of God is revealed therein, from faith unto faith ... The just man liveth by faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Pio
Real simple: There is no Salvation outside the Roman Catholic Church.
Oh, b-rother. There is no salvation outside of Jesus, ya nut.
65 posted on 06/23/2005 8:02:09 PM PDT by AnnaZ (><>Hebrews 11<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jo kus
I know this is not the optimum opportunity to bring this up. But unfortunately you are citing Fr. Most who is not speaking as a Catholic Theologian. He is promoting the same junk that Karl Rahner was spewing in the 50s.

Fr. Feeney never had to recant his position through all of the persecution he endured.

Any idea of "anonymous Christianity" is pure speculation. And ultimately it undermines the teachign of the Church.

There is not one dogmatic statement that indicates that Baptism of Desire or Baptism of Blood conveys the same character as Baptism of Water and Spirit. We hope for it in our weak and imperfect personal faith and understanding but nothing like that is part of revealed doctrine.

Millions and millions do go to Hell is the Catholic teaching. The way is narrow, many are invited and few get in.

Aquinas states two things, That even a just man with grace will fall into mortal sin. And secondly if someone has no access to Christ and still seeks him honestly, that God will send an Angel to minister to him. Whether that happens to our Protestant, Orthodox and Jewish, Muslim and Pagan friends in the time between the last second of life and the first second of death is known only to God, that person and the Spirits involved.

All of the citations used by Fr. Most can be addressed more accurately with an understanding of EENS that is consistent with the more direct statements by the Holy See. Fr. Most neglects to quote the Council of Florence but rather just alludes to it. I suspect he does this because it flies in the face of much of what he writes.

"[The most Holy Roman Church] firmly believes, professes, and proclaims that those not living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal life, but will depart `into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels' (Matt. 25:41), unless before the end of life the same have been added to the flock; and that the unity of the ecclesiastical body is so strong that only to those remaining in it are the sacraments of the Church of benefit for salvation, and do fastings, almsgiving, and other functions of piety and exercises of Christian service produce eternal reward, and that no one, whatever almsgiving he has practiced, even if he has shed blood for the name of Christ, can be saved, unless he has remained in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church."

Ignorance and good feelings and intentions are simply not enough and they are not equal to Christ's dying on the Cross, establishing his Church and giving us the Sacraments to enable us to participate in his gift of salvation.

God is the just Judge. Trust in him. We don't have to add to the deposit of Faith in order to make ourselves feel better. As Gerry Matatics said to me one time when referring to his daughter who died in childbirth (he baptized her immediately) "But if I was too late and if I'm graced enough to get to Heaven, if I don't see my daughter there, I'm not going to cross my arms and tell God that 'Hey! Something's wrong up here!"

66 posted on 06/23/2005 8:06:25 PM PDT by Gerard.P (The lips of liberals drip with honey while their hands drip with blood--Bishop Williamson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: murphE
Ah, those that want to start flame wars are out and about today. You get the prize for being first on this thread.

Clemenza's post was #23, the first flame was at #4. IMO.

67 posted on 06/23/2005 8:09:19 PM PDT by AnnaZ (><>Hebrews 11<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ

Oh, b-rother. There is no salvation outside of Jesus, ya nut.

Ya can't know Jesus outside of his Church, ya nut.

68 posted on 06/23/2005 8:12:09 PM PDT by Gerard.P (The lips of liberals drip with honey while their hands drip with blood--Bishop Williamson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ

Post number 4 just states Catholic doctrine.


69 posted on 06/23/2005 8:14:16 PM PDT by murphE (These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ
There is no salvation outside of Jesus, ya nut.

And is not the Church the Body of Christ, according to the express witness of Scripture? "Let them become the body of Christ, if they wish to live by the Spirit of Christ. None lives by the Spirit of Christ but the Body of Christ" (St. Augustine, Tract. in John, XXVI, 14). Christ Himself explains this clearly: "As the Father knoweth me, and I know the Father: and I lay down my life for my sheep. And other sheep I have that are not of this fold: them also I must bring. And they shall hear my voice: And there shall be one fold and one shepherd" (John 10:15-6), as does the Apostle: "Christ also loved the church and delivered himself up for it: That he might sanctify it, cleansing it by the laver of water in the word of life:" (Eph. 5:26-7).

70 posted on 06/23/2005 8:22:01 PM PDT by gbcdoj (For the justice of God is revealed therein, from faith unto faith ... The just man liveth by faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: murphE

I think churches should get involved with the Billy Graham Crusade.


71 posted on 06/23/2005 8:24:00 PM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pio

No salvation outside Jesus Christ you mean.


72 posted on 06/23/2005 8:24:23 PM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

How do you think that you are saved through Jesus Christ?


73 posted on 06/23/2005 8:28:43 PM PDT by Gerard.P (The lips of liberals drip with honey while their hands drip with blood--Bishop Williamson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
I think churches should get involved with the Billy Graham Crusade.

Cardinal Egan doesn't have time to be concerned about the man who has preached the Gospel before more people than any man in the history of mankind (including JPII).

He has to "prepare" for the Year of the Eucharist, which is half over.

74 posted on 06/23/2005 8:29:09 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Gerard.P

Why?


75 posted on 06/23/2005 8:29:14 PM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
I think churches should get involved with the Billy Graham Crusade.

How many false churches and how many true Churches do you think should get involved with the crusade?

76 posted on 06/23/2005 8:29:20 PM PDT by murphE (These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

I severely disagree with his decision. My local church would love to have gotten involved with the crusade. I'm going on my own to hand out flyers.


77 posted on 06/23/2005 8:30:23 PM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: murphE

That's not the point. Billy Graham is has led many to Jesus and why not get involved? I respect the man and his dedication to the gospel of Jesus.


78 posted on 06/23/2005 8:31:20 PM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

I'm curious as to how you believe someone is saved through Jesus Christ when so many disagree on how he is the savior, what he actually did in the Scriptures, what he meant when he said the things he said and how one sifts through the various contradictory positions in order to know what is necessary to believe in order to be saved.


79 posted on 06/23/2005 8:32:43 PM PDT by Gerard.P (The lips of liberals drip with honey while their hands drip with blood--Bishop Williamson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
That's not the point.

Oh but it is. Our Lord was very specific.

80 posted on 06/23/2005 8:34:02 PM PDT by murphE (These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-243 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson