Why not? Do you think that we are to weak?
up against combined world nations yes I think anyone would be weak
the top url gives a list of the laws concerning the 189 countries which is most of the world with the exception of a few countries like sweden...it is a treaty between all and forces peace, if any one person or country goes against the laws the rest involved in this will watch as the country or nation or person is tried by a world court. The second url shows why America opposes the new world justice system even though it is a member.
http://www.un.org/law/icc/statute/romefra.htm
http://www.infowars.com/print/nwo/unworldcourt.htm
Let's say . . . just for hypothetical discussion . . .
We are still immersed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran and Syria also require some level of attack along with North Korea.
Terrorists set off a nuke or 7 or so in NY CITY, DC, LA, Frisco and a key base or two.
China decides now is the time to retake Taiwan along with attacking our West Coast for good measure from umpteen containers full of PLA in Long Beach; flooding across the boarder with Mexicans eager to 'retake' our Southwest.
Throw in Mt Rainier lighting off and a major quake or 3 devastating Seattle as well as LA and Frisco.
Add in the New Madrid super quake.
Perhaps even add in Yellowstone.
Throw in Cuba, Russia, France, Venezuela, and a list of others as well as more varied terror attacks of a bio and chem nature.
Throw in some puppet master stooges gumming up any attempts in the Senate to support our survival.
How much do you think we'd be able to help Israel on top of half the above, much less 3/4ths or all of it?