Replies

There is no 'lrslattery' on the parish roles & tell the truth as to who wrote the letter. The, at most, 60 (not 150-200) could not write such a letter without intervention or assistance. In adition, 150-200 signatures contains a large gap of 50! The 10-11 families were not exiled, they left with the ADMINISTRATOR after no explainations for questionable expendatures caused him to lose signatory rights to the operating account. Annulments, jobs, and other monetary considerations have been provided to those 60 in exchange for their WORK against the parishioners of St. Stanislaus. THERE HAS BEEN A 3RD PARTY AUDIT CONDUCTED AND EVERYTHING WAS FINE!!! (FOR THE UPTEENTH TIME). The individuals that left are NO LONGER parishioners of St. Stan's or St. John's. They are parishioners of St. Agatha's.

R BACH

Mr. Bach: I never claimed to be a member of the parish. Perhaps, if you had read the post in its entirety, you might not have missed that point. It appears that reading comprehension seems to be a problem for many these days. A particularly interesting support for this observation can be seen if one happens to read the Original Charter and the Original By-laws.

The signatories to the Appeal Letter above are: Andrzej Blek, Danuta Krol, Teresa Blek, Basia Najarro, Jarek Czernikiewicz, Joe Skudrsyk, Ewa Dyk, and Bozena Skudrzyk.

You state: The, at most, 60 (not 150-200) could not write such a letter without intervention or assistance.

What is the insinuation here? Do you mean to say that they are incapable of writing an eloquent letter? Do they lack the mental prowess for such an undertaking? Do they not have a sufficient grasp of the English language? Please clarify yourself - tell us what you mean.

You further state: Annulments, jobs, and other monetary considerations have been provided to those 60 in exchange for their WORK against the parishioners of St. Stanislaus.

One would assume that you have proof of these charges, or is it similar to your other remarks - baseless and without foundation? Are you resorting to calumny, detraction, or means to distort the truth and cause confusion? I have been told by one of the signatories above that about 150 parishioners are attending St. John's currently and that more are coming each week. Am I to assume that this person is lying to me because you state something which is contrary?

The individuals that left are NO LONGER parishioners of St. Stan's or St. John's. They are parishioners of St. Agatha's.

You're being a little impatient here. The implementation has not taken place yet, so the 'exiled' parishioners of St. Stanislaus are stilling attending Mass as St. John's.