Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: lrslattery
You still have not told me WHO YOU ARE.
I have another concern with what you are posting. Let's discuss TRUTH. Truth is The Lord. The major reason for His attack upon the Pharisees. Yet, we are in the same calamity now with the 'selective' application of Canon Law. Written law that was created and imposed by those that it protects ... very similar to what Jesus was fighting. Also is modified, 1983, by those same individuals to try and shore-up and close loop holes. Now, taking another perspective, we have a newsletter in the St. Louis diocese called The Review. NOTHING concerning St. Stanislaus is allowed in that print without the bishop's permission. Why? He has stated that his word is the only Truth. Back to the infallibility question ... the Archbishop is not infallible. THAT IS OUR TEACHING AND OUR ROMAN CATHOLIC BELIEF.
117 posted on 03/02/2005 11:20:48 AM PST by PolishSTL (ST. STANISLAUS PARISHIONERS ARE WRONGED BY GREED OF ARCHDIOCESE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: PolishSTL
...Canon Law...Written law that was created and imposed by those that it protects ... Also is modified, 1983, by those same individuals to try and shore-up and close loop holes.

We must be reading, not from completely different pages, but completely different books, from completely different worlds:
Over the course of time, the Catholic Church has been wont to revise and renew the laws of its sacred discipline so that, maintaining always fidelity to the Divine Founder, these laws may be truly in accord with the salvific mission entrusted to the Church. With this sole aim in view, we today, 25 January 1983, bring to fulfillment the anticipation of the whole Catholic world, and decree the publication of the revised Code of Canon Law. In doing so, our thoughts turn back to this same date in 1959, when our predecessor, John XXIII of happy memory, first publicly announced his personal decision to reform the current body of canonical laws which had been promulgated on the feast of Pentecost 1917.

This decision to renew the Code was taken with two others, of which that Pontiff spoke on the same day: they concerned his desire to hold a synod of the diocese of Rome and to convoke an Ecumenical Council. Even if the former does not have much bearing on the reform of the Code, the latter on the other hand, namely the Council, is of the greatest importance for our theme and is closely linked with its substance.

According to you, the Code was created and modified by those it protects (Do you means Bishops and priests?) and to "shore up" loopholes? Well, I did not get that from the Statement of Promulgation.

119 posted on 03/03/2005 10:13:26 PM PST by lrslattery (http://slatts.blogspot.com ...Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson