Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: R. Scott
My point is with people who assume the Bible is the 100% literal word of God. It is only as literal as the translation is accurate.

The problem I have is that you must assume either the older languages have not changed, while the English has; or must have superior knowledge of the older language.

I get real tired listening to people talk about the archaic English from 400 ago while they forget that ancient Greek is filled with assumptions filled by looking at context. It too has changed, and more than English.
105 posted on 01/28/2005 6:55:50 AM PST by jps098
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: jps098
I get real tired listening to people talk about the archaic English from 400 ago while they forget that ancient Greek is filled with assumptions filled by looking at context. It too has changed, and more than English.

I doubt that a present day Greek could easily read the Greek of 2,000 years ago. It would be harder than my reading Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales as originally written. Fortunately my copy has the modern translation on the same page.
122 posted on 01/28/2005 7:49:12 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson