Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Coeur de Lion
In fact Aristotle's metaphysics places this God intrinsic in Nature instead of being transcendent.

Didn't Aristotle define God as pure act? Wouldn't this God transcend nature?

16 posted on 01/06/2005 8:13:58 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Aquinasfan
Didn't Aristotle define God as pure act? Wouldn't this God transcend nature?

In that sense, yes. But I was thinking more along the lines of cosmology and the theory of creation ex nihilo. Aristotle's God is confined to a universe with no beginning or end. I think the God of revealed religion proposes not a God confined to a universe with no beginning or end(Aristotelian), or a cyclic one of creation/re-creation(Eastern), but one which transcends even those. One who gives purpose as to why there's even a universe at all.

17 posted on 01/06/2005 2:20:51 PM PST by Coeur de Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson