[royalcello]

He can work to convince a majority of Americans to his views.

Convincing a king might be easier. And as I point out above, the support of a majority of Americans hasn't helped the cause of immigration reform.

You would, in essence, prefer a tyranny, as long as that tyrant agreed with you.

Since I do not equate Monarchy with Tyranny, and in fact believe that historically Tyranny has generally been the consequence of abolishing Monarchies, no, I would not.

[sinkspur]

And as I point out above, the support of a majority of Americans hasn't helped the cause of immigration reform.

An American Catholic monarch would allow unlimited immigration, legal and illegal, since that is now, and has always been, the position of the Church.