"Cardinal Ratzinger is quoted --EXCERPT is the name of the game! -- to support SSPX opinion about the Pauline Rite Mass."
This post is unreasonable. Now you object to excerpts. Would you have me cite Ratzinger's whole book on the liturgy, or his entire speech at the Fontgombault conference? Most informed people know he has been consistently one of the most outspoken critics of the Novus Ordo--even blaming it for the present crisis in the Church. It was he who wrote the introduction to Klaus Gamber's devastating critique on the New Mass as well.
Furthermore, while the Cardinal has been unreservedly negative about Bugnini's Mass--which he calls a "fabrication by a committee"--this in no way means that he is in total agreement with the SSPX--nor have I indicated anything at all like this. Just the opposite. If you followed the discussion on this thread, you would see I was arguing that his notion of "sacrifice" was not traditional by his own admission--that is, not propitiatory. This would not have been in agreement with the SSPX--nor was I suggesting it was.
In short, you don't know what you're talking about.