Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: GirlShortstop

"Cardinal Ratzinger is quoted --EXCERPT is the name of the game! -- to support SSPX opinion about the Pauline Rite Mass."

This post is unreasonable. Now you object to excerpts. Would you have me cite Ratzinger's whole book on the liturgy, or his entire speech at the Fontgombault conference? Most informed people know he has been consistently one of the most outspoken critics of the Novus Ordo--even blaming it for the present crisis in the Church. It was he who wrote the introduction to Klaus Gamber's devastating critique on the New Mass as well.

Furthermore, while the Cardinal has been unreservedly negative about Bugnini's Mass--which he calls a "fabrication by a committee"--this in no way means that he is in total agreement with the SSPX--nor have I indicated anything at all like this. Just the opposite. If you followed the discussion on this thread, you would see I was arguing that his notion of "sacrifice" was not traditional by his own admission--that is, not propitiatory. This would not have been in agreement with the SSPX--nor was I suggesting it was.

In short, you don't know what you're talking about.


398 posted on 09/25/2004 7:19:10 AM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies ]


To: ultima ratio; gbcdoj; bornacatholic


Where did you answer the questions that I posed?  
399 posted on 09/25/2004 7:25:57 PM PDT by GirlShortstop (« O sublime humility! That the Lord... should humble Himself like this... »)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson