Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ratzinger says new springtime of the Church not about numbers
Catholic World News ^ | August 9, 2004

Posted on 08/09/2004 3:48:56 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah

Abuja, Argentina, Aug. 09 (CNA/CWNews.com) - Speaking with the Polish Catholic news agency KAI, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (bio - news) said that the "new springtime" of the Church is a reality, but that it will not "necessarily" be significant in terms of numbers.

The Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith told KAI that there are groups of the new generations in the Church today who represent "a new springtime of the Church that renews the world." The cardinal explained that "we should not think that in the near future Christianity will become a movement of the masses again, going back to a situation like Medieval times."

"At least we cannot expect that in the current conditions," he added.

Nevertheless, recalling a phrase used by the Vladimir Lenin, founder of the Soviet Union, Ratzinger said that "the powerful minorities, which have something to say and something to bring to society, will determine the future."


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

1 posted on 08/09/2004 3:48:57 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Nevertheless, recalling a phrase used by the Vladimir Lenin...

You gotta be freaking kidding me. You are kidding right?

2 posted on 08/09/2004 4:04:02 PM PDT by AAABEST (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
that "the powerful minorities, which have something to say and something to bring to society, will determine the future."

It's too bad this 'prediction' has its genesis in 'the opiate of the people' guy, but maybe the Minorities will have more of an affinity for Tradition?

But back to something the New Oxford Review stated several years ago: The Future Belongs to the Fertile.

P.S. But, of all the quote joints in all of the world, he had to pick Lenin's to make a pit stop in?

3 posted on 08/09/2004 4:35:03 PM PDT by AlbionGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
That Lenin thing is weird. Is there some context maybe that's not given? His Eminence is not senile [yet], and I mean, it seems kinda out of place, quoting one of the Vatican's archenemies for no apparent reason.
4 posted on 08/09/2004 4:44:35 PM PDT by Lilllabettt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

The New Springtime, if there is one, consists of those Catholics who have found their way to traditional Catholicism.


5 posted on 08/09/2004 5:07:12 PM PDT by pascendi (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lilllabettt

Cardinal Ratzinger makes me uneasy. He speaks from both sides. One minute he supports traditionalists and the next minute he says something outrageous like this.

He was a big player in the VII revolution. I thought he had softened in his later years but quotes like this make me think not.


6 posted on 08/09/2004 5:07:31 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pascendi

No one will ever admit it.


7 posted on 08/09/2004 5:08:04 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Land of the Irish; ultima ratio; pascendi; nickcarraway; Maximilian; Pyro7480; NWU Army ROTC; ...

Ping for your thoughts.

Is Cardinal Ratzinger to be trusted?

(traditional Catholic ping list -- freepmail if you want off or on)


8 posted on 08/09/2004 5:10:16 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
If they ever did admit it, they would claim their ecumenical efforts were the cause.

In a strange way, they're at least a part of the cause, by way of making the absurd more manifest.
9 posted on 08/09/2004 5:11:09 PM PDT by pascendi (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

He strikes me as someone who may have been becoming a closet traditionalist while on the job, but unable to openly act and speak freely for traditional Catholicism. That's just rank speculation.


10 posted on 08/09/2004 5:13:31 PM PDT by pascendi (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

It's not about numbers. Is it about scandals?


11 posted on 08/09/2004 5:18:13 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

"He speaks from both sides..."

Papal election coming up...


12 posted on 08/09/2004 5:19:41 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
This whole "springtime" thing is and always has been a bunch of phoney newsspeak nonsense. That said, I just can't believe that Ratzinger would ever quote Lenin on such matters. I won't believe it.

My faith in the epicopal hasn't fallen that far.

13 posted on 08/09/2004 5:30:05 PM PDT by AAABEST (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Lots of theologians make me uneasy. Sometimes they do not take into account the sensitivities of their audience. I am the first to admit that Cardinal Ratzinger is sometimes guilty of talking about 'frivolous' things and forgetting to mention the important things. So he goes on and on and on about details and complex theological propositions. Sometimes he can cause a stir, because he does that without thoroughly discussing the fundamentals, which he assumes everyone already agrees to. When Ratzinger writes about the Eucharist, for example, he often does not expound repeatedly on the Real Presence of Christ. He feels the points on that have been made, and they are set in stone, and everyone believes it. So he talks more about other things. But people think because he does not emphasize that, he is somehow against it.


14 posted on 08/09/2004 5:33:00 PM PDT by Lilllabettt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lilllabettt

Excuse me, but aren't bishops supposed to tell us what is essential about the faith and what is not? Does he "just happen" to leave out the Real Presence when talking about the Eucharist--or is it by design? One never knows with Ratzinger. Do you think Catholics have stopped kneeling for Communion for better traffic control during Mass--or is that just a pretext? Is there a modernist agenda, do you suppose?


15 posted on 08/09/2004 5:48:44 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
" ...In my opinion, this ought in the first place to be above all an educative process, which would put a stop to this trampling all over the liturgy with one's own inventions. For fostering a true consciousness in liturgical matters, it is also important that the proscription against the form of liturgy in valid use up to 1970 should be lifted. Anyone who nowadays advocates the continuing existence of this liturgy or takes part in it is treated like a leper; all tolerance ends here. There has never been anything like this in history; in doing this we are despising and proscribing the Church's whole past. How can one trust her present if things are that way? I must say, quite openly, that I don't understand why so many of my episcopal brethren have to a great extent submitted to this rule of intolerance, which for no apparent reason is opposed to making the necessary inner reconciliations within the Church. (page 416 "God and the World" by Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger)
16 posted on 08/09/2004 5:53:29 PM PDT by Lilllabettt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lilllabettt

Who is the real Cardinal Ratzinger?


17 posted on 08/09/2004 5:56:16 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lilllabettt
When Ratzinger writes about the Eucharist, for example, he often does not expound repeatedly on the Real Presence of Christ. He feels the points on that have been made, and they are set in stone, and everyone believes it. So he talks more about other things. But people think because he does not emphasize that, he is somehow against it.

Only ignorant people think Ratzinger is "against" the Real Presence.

Very ignorant people.

18 posted on 08/09/2004 5:58:27 PM PDT by sinkspur (If we were as good as our dogs think we are, what a wonderful world we'd have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
I don't think the Cardinal "leaves out" the Real Presence. He just doesn't emphasize it. The only reason I can think of is that he has nothing more to say on the matter. No original thoughts. When the Cardinal rights his theological books, he is not trying to teach anybody anything with 'authority', he is writing down his original ruminations; an exercise that is common in overly intellectual circles. "Private" theological writing is Ratzinger's favorite thing to do; he told John Paul that he could not bear to accept the CDF job if he were forbidden from continuing to do so.

I don't know why Catholics stopped kneeling at Communion. I still see people do it every now and then. I do know that Cardinal Ratzinger has repeatedly said that kneeling is an ancient, perfectly acceptable way to receive Communion, and that the priest who denies a kneeling communicant the Eucharist invites the severest discipline of the Church.
19 posted on 08/09/2004 6:00:41 PM PDT by Lilllabettt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah; Akron Al; Alberta's Child; Andrew65; AniGrrl; Antoninus; ...
Ping for your thoughts.

Ratzinger is merely walking the walk, and talking the talk of his boss. From the same CNA website:

CASTEL GANDOLFO, Italy, August 9 (CNA) - During the Angelus prayer held yesterday at his summer residence of Castel Gandolfo, Pope John Paul II once again recalled Pope Paul VI and his encyclical about the Church, adding that the Second Vatican Council marked a true renewal of the Church.

In his first encyclical ‘Ecclesiam suam’, Paul VI “declared his passionate love for the Church, which is called to reflect the glorious light of Christ’s face, and indicated several fundamental ‘ways of the Church’: conscience, renewal, dialogue,” said Pope John Paul.

Quoting the encyclical, the pontiff continued: “The Church is alive today more than ever! But when one considers, it seems that there is still a lot to do; the work begins today and never ends.”

“These words,” said the Pope, “reflect our actual reality and motivate all believers to carry on, in a conscious way, in the authentic ecclesial renewal, introduced by the Second Vatican Council.”

20 posted on 08/09/2004 6:01:34 PM PDT by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson