Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: gbcdoj

Luther didn't defend Catholic Tradition, he was a revolutionary--like the Pontiff. The Archbishop drew the line in the sand--this is Catholic Tradition. If you, the Roman Pontiff, oppose it, however much I may revere your office, I am obliged to resist you and defend the faith. I cannot be complicit in establishing a new religion.


875 posted on 07/21/2004 6:51:22 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 869 | View Replies ]


To: ultima ratio
Luther didn't defend Catholic Tradition, he was a revolutionary

He was defending Scripture - isn't that traditional enough?

Unless I am convinced by Scripture and plain reason — I do not accept the authority of the popes and councils, for they have contradicted each other — my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and will not recant anything for to go against conscience is neither right nor safe. God help me. Amen.
Christ . . . is the Master of my doctrine . . . it is not mine, but His own pure Gospel. (Against the Falsely So-Called Spiritual Estate of the Pope and Bishops, July 1522)
For inasmuch as I know for certain that I am right, I will be judge above you and above all the angels, as St. Paul says, that whoever does not accept my doctrine cannot be saved. For it is the doctrine of God, and not my doctrine. (Against the Falsely So-Called Spiritual Estate of the Pope and Bishops, July 1522)

878 posted on 07/21/2004 7:00:10 PM PDT by gbcdoj (No one doubts ... that the holy and most blessed Peter ... lives in his successors, and judges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson