IN case you haven't noticed, there are NO validly-ordained priests of SSPX except those which were validly ordained in a Diocese and THEN joined SSPX.
There are also no validly-ordained BISHOPS in SSPX.
They are all excommunicandi, schizzies.
There are also no validly-ordained BISHOPS in SSPX.
Would you like to rethink the above response before someone makes a fool out of you?
Woah, ninenot, usually your posts are 100% correct, but I have to correct you here. All SSPX priests are validly ordained. At my old parish in Sacramento, one of the priests there is a former SSPX priest now an associate member of the SSPX, when he became regularized with Rome again, he was re ordained. The 4 SSPX Bishops, wile excommunicated, were validly concecrated, if they were not vaidly concecrated, then the late Bishop Rangel of the Campos PAA, who was concecrated Bishop by the 4 SSPX Bishops, would have been re concecrated by Rome back in early 2002 when he brought his group back into a regular regularized relationship with Rome. None of the Campos PAA priests were re ordained either since they allready had valid orders. At worst, the SSPX is in a similar position to the Eastren Orthodox, in being schismatics with valid orders.
I know these threads work your nerves ninenot, but we have to be honest, or more fuel is added to the fire, and the flame fests go on and on and on and on. Again, I will be the first to say Bp. Williamson lacks sanity, I will be the first to say the SSPX leadership is afflicted with the sin of Pride, and I will be the first to say if there is a goodwill effort to serve traditional Catholics like there is in your Archdiocese, the Traditional Catholics should attend the Indult, but we can not afford to let rehtoric to obscure facts on both sides.