SSPX's self-generated, self-approved, and self-serving monograph on its "tribunals" are not exactly a guide on which a Catholic should rely.
And they cover themselves neatly with their 2nd-last graph: 'of course, Rome will have to approve all this in the end.'
So show us, in Canon Law, not in SSPX's INTERPRETATION of Canon Law, how SSPX "marriages" are valid. In particular, please demonstrate those exceptions to Canon 1108 which substantiate your position.
In 500 words or less, please.
And yes, I did read gbcdoj's intervention, which was as usual, dead-on.
Your case gets less persuasive every moment.
It is HIGHLY unlikely that an adherent of SSPX is invincibly ignorant of the Society's status, unless the Society hides it.
But if SSPX is so noble, and so good, and so holy--WHY on Earth would they HIDE the fact that they are all excommunicandi?
BE: your turn to watch UR. I've done my 4 hours, got my 500+ years' off Purgatory.
Why do you get so wigged-out when one questions the validity of a novus ordo consecration, yet you yourself question the validity of Sacraments of other validly ordained priests?