[gbcdoj]

ultima, that article you use is based on the 1973 ICEL translation, widely known for misrepresenting the normative text of the NO promulgated by Paul VI. The "new sacramentary" is the one that was rejected by Rome as unacceptable - so bad that it would be better to just start over.

In fact, the Post Communionem prayer for the 8th Sunday of Ordinary Time is:

Satiati munere salutari,
tuam, Domine, misericordiam deprecamur,
ut, hoc eodem quo nos temporaliter vegetas sacramento,
perpetuae vitae participes benignus efficias.

[Lit trans.] Having been filled to satiety with the saving gift,
we beg, O Lord, your mercy,
that by means of that same sacrament by which you are enlivening
us now for a time,
you will kindly make us participants of life everlasting.

Look at that paper again - it's comparing the Latin missal of 1970 to the ICEL 'translation'.

[ultima ratio]

Yes, but the damage is done. Nor is it only translations which are the problem. The entire focus of the Novus Ordo is blasphemous, trained on the community instead of worship of the Father. The Mass is a celebration of our salvation, not a true propitiatory sacrifice because of our sinfulness. The underlying theology is Protestant--and rejects the need for any true re-presentation of Calvary. The Novus Ordo is in fact a memorial meal instead--exactly as prohibited by Trent. The versus populi is but an admission of what is in the minds of the modernists who gave us the new missal--it is all about us.