It's clear to me that you are NOT familiar with the Bible and prophecy in particular.
Literally volumes have been written about this. I have never seen your home grown arbitrary interpretation before.
What you may want to do is read the Bible, understand the symbolism and then review this site:
http://www.messiahrevealed.org/
It matches up OLD and NEW Testament prophecy. It is consistent. It is not arbitrary. What is in the New Testament is not different than what is in the Old Testament. More or less detail is provided in both however both are describing the same events and Satan in his carious forms.
I pray you get over your pride and do this on your own. I fear your confusion is blinding you to fairly straight forward truth available to all who seek it.
SEEK IT!
Don't fabricate to suit your wishful predetermined outcome.
You still haven't cited a single reference from Revelations to the anti-Christ.
>> Literally volumes have been written about this. I have never seen your home grown arbitrary interpretation before. <<
Just because you don't agree with me doesn't mean I haven't studied it. There are so many schools of studying Revelations among 20th-century Protestants: Preterists, futurists, and historicists; a-millennialists, pre-mills, and post-mills, pre-tribs, post-tribs. The irony is that so many sola-scriptura Protestants seem to know nothing about Revelations other than what is peddled by snake-oil salesman, like Hal Lindsey and the LaHayes.
A dozne times I've asked you to tell me just what in Revelations you believe to be the anti-Christ. You're so sure it's there, but you can't find a single reference. And you have the nerve to tell me I don't know anything about Revelations?