[broadsword]

I cant really picture that Jesus meant to say, "And if I were the devil, that'd be good thing, anyway, because that'd mean I'm fighting against other demons."

That's kind of a weird stretch, my friend. they said He was exorcising demons by the power of Satan, not that He WAS Satan. he replied that if Satan is fighting himself, then he would fall. Your whole take on that passage is odd. I have never seen it before. It is uncatholic and an awful strain to support the "Zoro is the source of all" argument. I would drop it if I were you. But then, I am not you. Perhaps you have some unorthodox reasoning that is just not apparent to me.

[dangus]

How is it un-Catholic to show that Jesus was asserting monotheism? How does it support the "Zoro is the soources of all" if I am showing how Zoroastrianism is opposed to Christianity?

>>Perhaps you have some unorthodox reasoning that is just not apparent to me.<<

I trust you mean unorthodox as in "unusual" and not as in "heterodox," right? ;^)