Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: B Knotts
The Society ordained their own bishops. Any Modernist bishop in the Church who did the same thing would get the same treatment from the Vatican.

The fact that Lefebvre and his Society didn't get excommunicated for this:

We refuse, on the other hand, and have always refused to follow the Rome of neo-Modernist and neo-Protestant tendencies which were clearly evident in the Second Vatican Council and, after the Council, in all the reforms which issued from it.

really says it all concerning the laxity with which the Roman Pontiffs treated the SSPX.

44 posted on 04/09/2004 9:44:07 PM PDT by gbcdoj (in mundo pressuram habetis, sed confidite, ego vici mundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: gbcdoj
I wasn't talking about Lefebvre himself, who clearly invoked a latae sententiae excommunication by his actions.

I'm talking about the run-of-the-mill SSPX types.

It just seems like traditionalist dissenters are promptly and harshly dealt with, while modernist abuses are winked at, at least to some degree.

45 posted on 04/09/2004 10:11:04 PM PDT by B Knotts (Salve!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: gbcdoj
"The Society ordained their own bishops. Any Modernist bishop in the Church who did the same thing would get the same treatment from the Vatican."

The Chinese Patriotic Association doesn't get the same treatment.
47 posted on 04/10/2004 4:33:29 AM PDT by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson