To: gbcdoj
"Therefore Lumen Gentium §21 contains an infallible definition."
No it doesn't.
To: pascendi; gbcdoj; nika
**Therefore Lumen Gentium §21 contains an infallible definition.**
No it doesn't.
Is there more to follow pascendi, or can I laugh at your statement as it stands?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson