Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: m4629
Besides, the authors did not display disrespect or malice towards the Holy Father.

No. He says the Pope is useless (just read the article, please).
I see nothing wrong with the Pope, I say the author is useless, and the publication that printed his heretical diatribe is useless.

82 posted on 04/02/2004 4:25:27 PM PST by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: heyheyhey; johnb2004
No. He says the Pope is useless (just read the article, please).

The author did not use the word useless. So if it's your own view that is the case, you'll have to expound more on this, help me out.

Mind you, you still have not made convincing argument that a critical and honest analysis of the Pope's speech in this case in light of constant teachings on Hell or other prudential judgement does not equate to "heresies". If the

Pope had indeed suffered "a slip of the tongue", he certainly had ample opportunity to make correction. In this case, it appears the editor did it for him, just as well.

Personally, I feel this article is fair.

You will have to be very specific in making your case, carefully distinguishing WHY being disrespectful (only your opinion) amounts to spewing of Heresies (from the authors).

84 posted on 04/02/2004 4:49:41 PM PST by m4629
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: heyheyhey
He says the Pope is useless (just read the article, please).

No, he does not.

The author is a liar.

Backatcha.

120 posted on 04/06/2004 10:00:20 AM PDT by TradicalRC (Mea minima culpa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson