Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: cebadams
I don't know why people criticize the new norms. Of course there should be due process, but if one is convicted, why shouldn't there be zero tolerance for the abuse of children? Of course, the seminaries also need to be cleaned up, discipline enforced and Catholic doctrine pure and entire needs to be inculcated in the clergy and the faithful.
7 posted on 03/29/2004 9:19:38 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Unam Sanctam
>> I don't know why people criticize the new norms. Of course there should be due process, but if one is convicted, why shouldn't there be zero tolerance for the abuse of children?

Because zero-tolerance is such a politically correct way to deal with abuse. Let's face it, abuse is a criminal offense and should be treated as one. Shaw makes a good point about transparency. The notion that the Bishop's felt that they had to deal with abuse cases outside of the context of law was their first mistake.

As a parent I don't want platitudes about zero-tolerance; I want to know that suspected criminal activity is promptly turned over to the criminal justice system.
8 posted on 03/29/2004 9:36:20 AM PST by cebadams (Amice, ad quid venisti? (Friend, whereto art thou come?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson