Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: cebadams
I disagree. Canon law and civil law are entirely different spheres. Both should be allowed their full province. If one breaches civil law, one should be dealt with by the civil law. If one breaches canon law, one should be dealt with by canon law. If one breaches both, one should be dealt with by both. The state has no right to interfere in canon law and the Church should not be dependent on the state for enforcing its own internal rules.
12 posted on 03/29/2004 10:37:59 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Unam Sanctam
>> Canon law and civil law are entirely different spheres. Both should be allowed their full province.

Hiding priests in institutions and moving them around is not part of Canon Law. Shaw brings up very good points about transparency. Civil Law gets to decide if there was a criminal offense. It is necessary that both be allowed to work in their respective jurisdictions.
17 posted on 03/29/2004 3:40:03 PM PST by cebadams (Amice, ad quid venisti? (Friend, whereto art thou come?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson