Skip to comments.
FR Religion Forum has Crossed the Tiber
Self
Posted on 03/18/2004 9:49:04 AM PST by ksen
Well it looks to me like the FR Religion forum has crossed the Tiber and is now an official organ of the Vatican.
TOPICS: Ecumenism; General Discusssion; Theology
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 281-282 next last
To: drstevej
Saint Nike.... "Just Do It." Hezekiah 2:20
Cordially
181
posted on
03/18/2004 9:32:16 PM PST
by
Diamond
Comment #182 Removed by Moderator
To: Salve Regina
Nothing, really. It's just my feeble attempt at a little dry humor in the spirit of the thread.
Cordially,
183
posted on
03/19/2004 7:03:21 AM PST
by
Diamond
To: Diamond
How to Annoy a Protestant in 15 Easy Steps Ask him if he calls his dad "Father."
SD
Comment #185 Removed by Moderator
Comment #186 Removed by Moderator
To: Hermann the Cherusker; RnMomof7
The point to all of this is that "self-identified" Catholics vote just like the rest of America. Actual church-going Catholics overwhelming voteed for Bush in 2000.
So saying "Catholics vote Democrat" depends entirely on whther "Catholic" means anyone who claims he is such, or whether it means those who actually go to church regularly.
SD
To: SoothingDave
Ask him if he calls his dad "Father." When our children were young, they called me "Daddy". It's the the equivalent of "Abba" in Aramaic. It was always music to my ears, and I think that to God our Father it is the same way.
Cordially,
188
posted on
03/19/2004 10:06:50 AM PST
by
Diamond
To: Salve Regina
Thank you, Salve. All I can say is dittos.
Cordially,
189
posted on
03/19/2004 10:08:12 AM PST
by
Diamond
Comment #190 Removed by Moderator
To: Salve Regina; HarleyD
Step 3: Remind them that the Catholic Church wrote the NT of the Bible, owns the oldest copies of it and actually put it together in the 300s by the order of Pope St. Damasus.
Fourthly, the Catholic claim of giving the Bible to the world cannot be true because they have not been the sole possessor of the Bible at any time. Some of the most valuable Greek Bibles and Versions have been handed down to us from non-Roman Catholic sources. A notable example of this is the Codex Sinaiticus which was found in the monastery of St. Catherine (of the Greek Orthodox Church) at Mount Sinai in 1844 and is now in the British Museum. It contains all of the books of the New Testament and all but small portions of the Old Testament. Scholars are certain that this manuscript was made early in the fourth century, not later than 350 A.D. This manuscript found by a German scholar named, Tishendorf, who was a Protestant, and this manuscript which is the most complete of all has never been in the hands of the Roman Catholic Church.
Another valuable manuscript that has never been possessed by the Roman Catholic Church is the Codex Alexandrianus. It, too, is now on exhibit in the manuscript room of the British Museum in London. It was a gift from the Patriarch of Constantinople (of the Greek Orthodox Church) to Charles I in 1628. It had been in possession of the Patriarchs for centuries and originally came from Alexandria, Egypt from which it gets its name. Scholars are certain that this manuscript was also made in the fourth century and, along with the Codex Sinaiticus, is thought to be one of the fifty Greek Bibles commissioned to be copied by Constantine.
There was no Roman Catholic Church when the Bible was written
(not to mention that the first Pope is buried in the Vatican, by some odd coincidence)
Do you mean the Pope with two skulls?
The most precious of Peter's bones found in the Graffiti Wall are the 29 fragments of the Apostle's skull. Note: the 29 pieces of Peter's skull found in the Grafitti Wall are not to be confused with Peter's other skull, which is stored in the Cathedral of St. John Lateran.
Peter's Bones
191
posted on
03/19/2004 11:35:55 AM PST
by
OLD REGGIE
((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN) Maybe a Biblical Unitarian?)
To: xzins
An online forum provides a certain level of anonymity, and with it a coarsening of manners.
And perhaps allows a more frank (less "politically correct") discussion.
192
posted on
03/19/2004 11:43:26 AM PST
by
OLD REGGIE
((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN) Maybe a Biblical Unitarian?)
To: OLD REGGIE
Bwahahahahaha!
It contains all of the books of the New Testament and all but small portions of the Old Testament. Scholars are certain that this manuscript was made early in the fourth century, not later than 350 A.D. when there was but One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, of which the (Earthly) leader was the Bishop of Rome. The great East/West schism had not occured yet, much less the Protestant rebellion, and the Unitarjewmian cult had most certain not yet been invented.
193
posted on
03/19/2004 11:44:01 AM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Chief Engineer, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemens' Club)
To: OLD REGGIE
Frank is fine.
But WWJD??
194
posted on
03/19/2004 11:46:45 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: Salve Regina; RnMomof7
Actually, I think you could pin the Catholic voting habits on the unions. A lot of the elder Catholics in the country sided with the unions and their voting habits are hard to change. Fewer and fewer Catholics (especially us younger ones) are voting for the dems. I've even seen my inlaws change their voting habits over the years. When I met them, they were more on the Dems side, but are now voting Repub on every issue.
195
posted on
03/19/2004 11:59:29 AM PST
by
al_c
To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
You Rang?Hey ... just what do you think you're doin', buddy?!
196
posted on
03/19/2004 12:03:36 PM PST
by
al_c
To: ArrogantBustard
when there was but One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, of which the (Earthly) leader was the Bishop of Rome. The great East/West schism had not occured yet, much less the Protestant rebellion, and the Unitarjewmian cult had most certain not yet been invented.
A brilliant mixture of truth and falsehood.
Council at Nicea (325 AD)
CANON IV. IT is by all means proper that a bishop should be appointed by all the bishops in the province; but should this be difficult, either on account of urgent necessity or because of distance, three at least should meet together, and the suffrages of the absent bishops] also being given and communicated in writing, then the ordination should take place. But in every province the ratification of what is done should be left to the Metropolitan.
CANON VI. LET the ancient customs in Egypt, Libya and Pentapolis prevail, that the Bishop of Alexandria have jurisdiction in all these, since the like is customary for the Bishop of Rome also. Likewise in Antioch and the other provinces, let the Churches retain their privileges. And this is to be universally understood, that if any one be made bishop without the consent of the Metropolitan, the great Synod has declared that such a man ought not to be a bishop. If, however, two or three bishops shall from natural love of contradiction, oppose the common suffrage of the rest, it being reasonable and in accordance with the ecclesiastical law, then let the choice of the majority prevail.
197
posted on
03/19/2004 12:16:38 PM PST
by
OLD REGGIE
((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN) Maybe a Biblical Unitarian?)
To: xzins
But WWJD??
Neither you nor I know.
198
posted on
03/19/2004 12:18:54 PM PST
by
OLD REGGIE
((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN) Maybe a Biblical Unitarian?)
To: OLD REGGIE
And this is to be universally understood There's some wishful thinking.
from natural love of contradiction
Sounds familiar.
SD
Comment #200 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 281-282 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson