Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: malakhi
That might work for Dave, but not for me; I don't accept Romans as canonical.

Can you explain to me how these two statements are not logically inconsistent?

Whose logic are you trying to strain them through?

4,106 posted on 04/13/2004 6:58:10 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4103 | View Replies ]


To: Alex Murphy
Whose logic are you trying to strain them through?

There is more than one logic? Interesting.

Now, can you explain how those two statements are not logically inconsistent?

If you can't do it, just say so.

4,111 posted on 04/13/2004 7:06:15 PM PDT by malakhi (L'shana haba'ah b'Yerushalayim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4106 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy; malakhi
Whose logic are you trying to strain them through?

You know. Logic logic. What a strange question. Unless you are claiming that God is irrational.

SD

4,187 posted on 04/14/2004 6:27:18 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson