[OLD REGGIE]

There is a difference between construction and de-construction. Between development of doctrine and an historical growing of a consensus versus a simple negation and disassembly of orthodoxies.

I agree. I was merely using "de-construction" because I thought it was a phony issue.

Has it ever occurred to you that an investigation of the changes caused by "development of doctrine" and "historical growing of a consensus" could lead to what you call "de-construction" in order to return to the full truth?

Maybe the extra-Scriptural "constructions" of the past 2,000 years require some "de-construction"?

[SoothingDave]

Has it ever occurred to you that an investigation of the changes caused by "development of doctrine" and "historical growing of a consensus" could lead to what you call "de-construction" in order to return to the full truth?

Depends on what the "full truth" is.

SD