Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Quester
Then perhaps you can direct us to where he made this call.

Vince posted to me the copy of the post I had seen , he said that he was responding to a mail from the mod. I will take him at his word..but it sure would be interesting who contacted the mod so the Calvinists could be suspended..we do not do suicide .You have admitted being one ...so who was the first?

I agree with Cindys original post on the topic..people need to have the honesty to out themselves.

Not wanting to get suspended for flaming , unless one of you have any proof that it was one of us, you need to stop the accusations that we did it or we want the thread killed or that we have some "secret agenda". I told you why we post,to present the gospel clearly and without apology ..PERIOD

3,590 posted on 04/12/2004 10:11:30 AM PDT by RnMomof7 (Broomstick Jockey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3520 | View Replies ]


To: RnMomof7; malakhi
I will take him at his word..

He shows you the actual message from the mod and the best you can do is say "I'll take him at his word"? If I were you I consider apologizing for the slander, but that's just me.

Do mods always have to be pinged to suspend someone. Sometimes they moniotr these threads on their own.

3,593 posted on 04/12/2004 10:15:12 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3590 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7
Not wanting to get suspended for flaming, unless one of you have any proof that it was one of us, you need to stop the accusations that we did it or we want the thread killed or that we have some "secret agenda".

I don't think that anyone has accused you of having a secret agenda.


It was only that, ... after being warned of impending shutdown on a thread that appeared to be staying within mod limits, ... there was a question as to why.

It seems that something was going on which, ... to this point, noone has been able to figure out.

I think that qualifies as someone having a possible secret agenda, though, as yet, we still don't know who.

I believe that you have said as much yourself on a recent post, ... though, of course, you were a bit more specific.

P.S. I identified no poster(s) when I responded back to JimRob's warning. I only posited that the warning of impending thread closure seemed strange, given the current relative non-volativity of the thread.

I asked them to check the thread themselves to verify that any complaints that had been made to them were valid before they took action to shut the thread down.

3,603 posted on 04/12/2004 10:42:58 AM PDT by Quester (Is this a trick question ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3590 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7
The only reason I asked about you wanting the thread "killed" was because in the past you have said you wanted it out of the religious forum. IIRC you said something about serious appologists considered it a joke. That's not paranonia but just wondering if you still felt the same way.
3,627 posted on 04/12/2004 11:03:36 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3590 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson