Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alex Murphy
My bet is that, within the next year, you decide that Talmudic Judaism is also wrong. Can't wait to see if you fall before Baal & Ashteroth first, or just take the plunge and jump right into Moloch worship.

Now that is just plain offensive and unnecessary.

Out of curiousity, have you always held your current beliefs? Or have your religious beliefs evolved over time?

1,732 posted on 04/05/2004 10:26:18 AM PDT by malakhi ("JWA -- Jew With Attitude")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1720 | View Replies ]


To: malakhi; drstevej; ksen; RnMomof7; Invincibly Ignorant
Now that is just plain offensive and unnecessary.

By all means, please explain to me how the Babylonian Talmud entry in Gittin 56b-57a isn't offensive. And please offer your own beliefs as to said Talmud, the eternal fate of one "Jesus of Nazareth", and of those of us who are His followers.

Please feel free to use the online Jewish Encyclopedia as a starting point. See the listing for "Jesus of Nazareth", under the subsection "Resurrection", middle of the paragraph. Look for the sentance with the phrase "the degrading fate of those who mock the wise", which specifically links the Talmud entry I named above (which talks about a man named "Balaam") with one "Jesus of Nazareth".

1,738 posted on 04/05/2004 10:54:11 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1732 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson