Right, he's decided to attack something far more important than me, my Church, my faith, and well documented Christian history. As for making me uncomfortable, I demolished every single one of his rather stupid attempts to rewrite history by quoting the records, their authors, and the sources. Even Protestant Churches that once made his very old arguments no longer believe them. The historical record that Peter went to Rome and died there is incontrovertable. Only a few die-hards remain who believe this drivel. I am very comfortable, thankyou.
"I've no respect for someone whose strongest argument is name calling."
I could care less whom you respect, or why. My strongest argument was stating the facts, which your apostate creepy friend never responded to. He led his attack on history with his alleged anthropological "evidence". I destroyed his thesis by injecting reality into it and he decided to switch his venue over to his personal interpretation of Peter's Epistle. That too was shot down by informing him of the Church Fathers' interpretation of that Scripture verse. His last and most feeble attempt of all was denying that certain of these Fathers wrote about Peter. Both myself and Hermann the Cherusker posted the quotes which he said did not exist. End of story.
Uncomfortable? No I enjoy exposing these creeps. smile :o)