I think you'll find OP posted this lying nonsense to begin with. First stones, as well, are in the eyes of the beholder.
That said, I agree that such is folly.
SD
OP began a civil discussion concerning speculation as to the burial place of Peter.
Now, ... notwithstanding the implications of such a discussion, it was characterized by the, rather civil, proferring of various opinions on the subject matter ...
... until Crusader tossed in his ad hominem.
I, simply, felt that such a thing had no place in the civil discussion ... and responded in that light.