To: Truth666
Your whole premise is wrong, I was going to ignore the silly statement that started this fun little free for all.
Evolution is the best scientific theory to explain the evidence that now exists, if evidence comes to light, actual scientific evidence, that disproves evolution, a new theory will rise up in it's place, but until then, Your socalled "lie" will continue to be the best scientific explanation to fit the evidence that exist.
No lie, just a scientific theory that best fits the evidence.
It is so sad to see fanatics jump all over evolution like it is some sort of conspiracy, it is science, nothing more, nothing less. Whether you personally like it or not.
Your whole reason for starting this thread is comedic in the extreme, it shows nothing but fanaticism, and a closed mind to the scientific evidence at hand.
262 posted on
10/16/2003 9:32:46 AM PDT by
Ogmios
(Who is John Galt?)
To: Ogmios
But the fanatics (Creationists and their soul-mates, the PostModernDeconstructionists) are against evolutionary theory because it is science. In many (if not almost all) cases, they extend their attacks to physics, astronomy, chemistry, geology, among others. The Creationists-PostModernDeconstrucionists claim to have some type of "superior" knowledge that is to be used even when the evidence is otherwise.
271 posted on
10/16/2003 11:14:51 AM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson