[ItisaReligionofPeace]

No, I assume he is guilty because the story is credible and because he certainly didn't deny it.

[ozzymandus]

Oh, well, then he must be guilty if he didn't issue a public denial just for your benefit, right? By your standards, I must be guilty of kidnapping the Lindberg baby, becasue I haven't denied it.

[Not now, Not ever!]

No, I assume he is guilty because the story is credible and because he certainly didn't deny it. (you said this about Rush)

No, I assume he is guilty because the story is credible and because he certainly did deny it

(change that one word and also the subject to The "toon,) are you saying that bubba is/was innocent? You would have to, using that logic.

[longtermmemmory]

No, I assume he is guilty because the story is credible and because he certainly didn't deny it.

__ ___ ____ ___
in other words you are gulible.

The story is in no way credible. There are legal holes you can drive a mack truck through.

The ONLY evidence to date is a PICTURE OF A CIGAR BOX!

No audio, No emails, No ISP, No harddrive records, No mail reciepts, No credit card slips for said mail order drugs, NOTHING.

But, you find the enquirer credible.