Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
No, I assume he is guilty because the story is credible and because he certainly didn't deny it.

__ ___ ____ ___
in other words you are gulible.

The story is in no way credible. There are legal holes you can drive a mack truck through.

The ONLY evidence to date is a PICTURE OF A CIGAR BOX!

No audio, No emails, No ISP, No harddrive records, No mail reciepts, No credit card slips for said mail order drugs, NOTHING.

But, you find the enquirer credible.
136 posted on 10/09/2003 9:05:25 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory
Hmmm, why don't you go back and read your post now. It was apparent that his housekeeper would have known a lot about Rush, and it was obvious by his description last Friday (I'll tell more as the facts come out) that Rush Limbaugh has a drug problem. Why that is so difficult for some of you gullible people to understand is beyond me!
371 posted on 10/10/2003 7:44:08 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace ((the original))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson