Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TOM MCCLINTOCK DAILY EDITION - 10/8/03 - GOING DARK!

Posted on 10/08/2003 7:10:21 AM PDT by Rabid Dog

As many of you know this has been a local, regional, national news and views thread. I want to thank all of you that have respected its intent. When I first started this thead, I was on the fence between Arnold and Tom. Within a week, it became clear that Tom was the man I could respect and support.

Within a month it became clear that the CA G.O.P. was not an organization I could respect and support and so I have switched parties and will be changing my screen name to Rabid Dog.

Tomorrow I am entering Freeper Detox and will be drying out for a week or so but am looking foward to discussing the changes in California under the leadership of our new governor - ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER!!


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: mcclintock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-451 next last
To: jmaroneps37
"The guy's eyes make him look like a fruit fly, it seems like he's looking in three directions at once.
I still have no respect for him."

That comment says a lot about you. You're judging the man based on his looks? His beliefs mean nothing?

81 posted on 10/08/2003 8:59:53 AM PDT by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: poet
He was a political hack and I in no way wished to suggest their was an iota of loyalty by McClintock to the Republican party or it's people. He has no loyalty to anyone but himself, is dangerous and that is obvious.

It's going dark, time to close the lid on the coffin of his Republican political future.
82 posted on 10/08/2003 8:59:57 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
"asshats"

ROFL! I'll have to remember that one.

83 posted on 10/08/2003 9:00:10 AM PDT by strela ("Trust but verify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Republican
Rabid:
I'm sure I speak for many as I extend my sincere thanks for all of your positive, dignified efforts to get Tom's message across. You have done an excellent job in running this joint the past few weeks, encouraging lively discussion yet, at the same time, discouraging the crapola that has been sadly evident on so many other threads. You have been absolutely steadfast. I have no doubt that you will be generous in extending your support to our new Governor-Elect and, of course, I join you in that effort.

It is critical that we all pull together at this important moment in California's history. However, let me go on record as saying that if I am ever in a foxhole, I hope I'm in it with you and the rest of the "Tombots."

"Independent - I heard there are a lot of us on this forum!"

There are indeed. Enjoy "detox," and then come on aboard, the water's fine over here. :-)

84 posted on 10/08/2003 9:02:45 AM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Republican
I think Arnold is aware that there are many on the right that didn't get his full attention and hopefully some/many of his actions will keep us in mind.

Not likely if McClintock supporters jump ship in the proverbial "taking my toys and going home" reaction.

85 posted on 10/08/2003 9:04:02 AM PDT by Exigence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
All abandoning it will do is make it even worse.

Exactly. Those who are absent rarely get a voice in the party direction. It's like complaining that your candidate didn't win so you're going to stop voting. Neither are useful conceits.

86 posted on 10/08/2003 9:05:22 AM PDT by Exigence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon
Brooke fled for McClintock. :-P
87 posted on 10/08/2003 9:05:49 AM PDT by jmc813 (Alan Colmes called Arnold's win a "victory for moderates".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: strela
Is it time to cheer for some amorphous and immeasurably small "change" yet?
88 posted on 10/08/2003 9:06:02 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
It's going dark, time to close the lid on the coffin of his Republican political future.

Good thinking. We need a Democrat to unseat him. /mild sarcasm

89 posted on 10/08/2003 9:06:28 AM PDT by Exigence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
And should Arnold make a mistake as Govenror, you hatless asses will be right back here with your pious "we told you so" comments, based on one error. I can hardly wait. Hypocrites.

Say, by the way...."principled tom" said something about dropping out of the race if he didn't have enough to overtake Arnold, so he wouldn't split the vote. What do you Tombots think of his lying?
90 posted on 10/08/2003 9:06:38 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Republican
"Final Ping! We fought the good fight"

We certainly did and een though Tom didn't win there are several pluses.

Tom now has national name recognition(bring on Boxer).
Bustamecha is not governor.
We got the Gray out!
91 posted on 10/08/2003 9:06:51 AM PDT by gc4nra ( this tag line protected by Kimber and the First Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: strela
On issues alone, do you prefer Arnold or Tom?
92 posted on 10/08/2003 9:07:10 AM PDT by jmc813 (Alan Colmes called Arnold's win a "victory for moderates".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: All
Part of my reason for leaving the Republican Party is because it is populated with people I can't respect both at the leadership level and at the minion level. This became painfully obvious on this board.

It creeps me out. I never liked school bullies on the bus and I don't like them on the forum. Especially when they make personal attacks for lack of any other argument.

93 posted on 10/08/2003 9:07:47 AM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
"He was a political hack"

In no way, shape or form does he fit the description of a "political hack", an individualist yes, but, since when are individualists dangerous? Since when is a man or woman who stands by his/her convictions and core beliefs dangerous? What is the danger? That he is not an automoton to the party?

Maybe he is through in your Style over Substance party, but, as long as he stays the course, I will always vote FOR him regardless of whether he is a party member or an independant.
94 posted on 10/08/2003 9:09:41 AM PDT by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: strela
One of my all time favorites.
95 posted on 10/08/2003 9:10:11 AM PDT by jmc813 (Alan Colmes called Arnold's win a "victory for moderates".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
And Arnold told Riordan he wasn't going to run. Except it was regarded as "brilliant showmanship".

There will be no need say anything if Arnold "makes a mistake". In that case, nobody will remember voting for him.
96 posted on 10/08/2003 9:10:26 AM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Republican
Part of my reason for leaving the Republican Party is because it is populated with people I can't respect both at the leadership level and at the minion level.

Keep in mind that Arnold's handlers bypassed the party's voting membership in convention and got their board endorsement in a small backroom in Burbank.

97 posted on 10/08/2003 9:11:51 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Exigence
One would think so - but the majority in the party spoke when forming the platform - which a minority decided to abandon.
98 posted on 10/08/2003 9:12:25 AM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Exigence
Or marbles as the case may be.
99 posted on 10/08/2003 9:13:52 AM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
On issues alone, do you prefer Arnold or Tom?

Irrelevant. Arnold is the governor, Tom is not.

100 posted on 10/08/2003 9:14:12 AM PDT by strela ("Trust but verify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-451 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson