Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kkindt
reality is that Davis was not given a chance to be one of those considered by the electorate. This is not fair.

He certainly was.

They could have voted NO on the recall question.

And why do you keep harping on the recall vote being 51/49? It was not. He was rejected by a huge margin and not your plucked-out-of-thin-air ratio.

4,177 posted on 10/08/2003 10:24:31 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4167 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
What if he had received 49% of the vote saying NO to recall but Arnold had only received 34% of the vote. Arnold would be governor even though 49% of the people wanted Davis. Davis would not be governor in this scenario because the way the recall law is written he could not have his name on the ballot against Arnold. If Davis had had his name on the ballot along next to Arnolds as an option then it would have been a fair law.
4,193 posted on 10/13/2003 7:46:02 AM PDT by kkindt (knightforhire.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson